QRZ! Ham Radio 3/QRZ Ham Radio Callsign Database - Volume 3.iso/digests/infoham/940222.txt

Internet Message Format | 1994-06-04 | 27.1 KB

Date: Tue,  1 Mar 94 14:39:04 PST
From: Info-Hams Mailing List and Newsgroup <[e-mail]>
Errors-To: [e-mail]
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: Info-Hams Digest V94 #222
To: Info-Hams


Info-Hams Digest            Tue,  1 Mar 94       Volume 94 : Issue  222

Today's Topics:
                  ARRL--->Online Repeater directory
                   CW trainer for Sun workstation?
                            Hamfest in NJ
                              MicroSmith
                        MODS REQUEST: IC-2330
          personal communication Australia <-> USA (2 msgs)
                Software for DOS-PC for decoding Mor

Send Replies or notes for publication to: <[e-mail]>
Send subscription requests to: <[e-mail]>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to [e-mail].

Archives of past issues of the Info-Hams Digest are available
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/info-hams".

We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party.  Your mileage may vary.  So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 28 Feb 1994 15:24:48 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!convex!convex!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!olesun![e-mail]
Subject: ARRL--->Online Repeater directory
To: [e-mail]

In article <[e-mail]>,
Stephen Baker <[e-mail]> wrote:
>The league publishes the repeater directory which it currently enjoys monopoly
>status.  This must be enormously profitable for them as they are the sole source
>for such a directory, (maps aside).  I wonder if they have priviledged access to
>this information by virtue of some role they play in the frequency coordination
>process?
>
>If this is the case, then there is a conflict of interest issue here, and they
>should not in the repeatern directory business and frequency coordination
>business simultaneously if they will harrass competition.
>
A if you read the editorial in this months QST you will find that the ARRL
is not in the coordnation business it only strongly supports coordination.
I really hate to take up for the ARRL but if they were in the coordinaton
business publishing a directory would be no more of a conflict of interest
than publishing the proceedings of a conference.
Gordon AB5DG

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 28 Feb 1994 14:51:14 GMT
From: agate!library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!gatech!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!utcsri!newsflash.concordia.ca!sifon!clouso.crim.ca!hobbit.ireq.hydro.qc.ca!barde!@ihnp4.ucsd.edu
Subject: CW trainer for Sun workstation?
To: [e-mail]

In article [e-mail], [e-mail] (Bill Ross) writes:
>
>   Anybody know where I can find a morse training program which
>   will run on a sun?
>
>   Thanks!
>   Bill Ross
>   [e-mail]


Here is one program made by John S. Watson  4/29/87.
It works ok, but I prefer SuperMorse on a PC...
Regards,
Clem.
73
----------------------------

   Clement Vaillancourt,             |    Institut de Recherche d'Hydro-Quebec
   Analyste,                         |    Varennes, P. Quebec, Canada, J3X 1S1
   Informatique scientifique         | Tel:[phone] Fax:[phone]
   [e-mail]          |  Radio-amateur: [e-mail]

-----------------------------


#include <curses.h>
/*
 *  Morse Code Program for Suns    Version 1.0
 *
 *  Here is a little program I wrote that converts standard input
 *  to morse code.  The Sun's bell is used to beep the code.
 *  The speed of the generated beeps vary, depending on the model of Sun.
 *  Speed can be changed with the optional first argument on the command
 *  line:
 *
 *           % morse 2     # is twice as fast
 *           % morse 4     # is 3 times a fast
 *           % morse -2    # is  twice as slow
 *           % morse -3    # is  3 times a slow
 *
 *  It can be used across a network with remote shell:
 *
 *           % rsh remote_host morse
 *
 *  Or with pipes:
 *
 *           % fortune | morse
 *
 *  I have not include all the character set. ( ?, !, -, etc. )
 *  New characters can be easily added to the big case statement in main.
 *
 *  I don't have time to work with this anymore so don't send the bugs to me.
 *  Send me better versions though :^)
 *
 *  Oh yeah, this works on Suns version 3.2 of the UNIX4.3bsd operating system.
 *  compile with:
 *                    % cc morse.c -o morse -lcurses -ltermcap
 *
 *
 *   Have fun!
 *   John S. Watson  4/29/87
 */

#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/file.h>
#include <sundev/kbd.h>
#include <sundev/kbio.h>

int keyboard;
int scale = 10;
int factor = 1;
FILE *fildes;

unit_pause( number)
   int number;
{
   int i;

/*
   for ( i = 0; i < number* (int) scale; i++);
*/
 usleep(10000*scale*number);
}

dit()
{
   int on = KBD_CMD_BELL;
   int off = KBD_CMD_NOBELL;
   int i;

   ioctl(keyboard, KIOCCMD, &on);
   unit_pause(1);
   ioctl(keyboard, KIOCCMD, &off);
   unit_pause(1);
}


da()
{
   int on = KBD_CMD_BELL;
   int off = KBD_CMD_NOBELL;
   int i;

   ioctl(keyboard, KIOCCMD, &on);
   unit_pause( 3);
   ioctl(keyboard, KIOCCMD, &off);
   unit_pause( 1);
}


read_line( buffer)
  char buffer[];
{
  char character;
  int i = 0;

  do
    {
    character = fgetc(fildes);
    if (character == EOF )
  {
  resetty();
  exit(0);
  }
    buffer[i] = character;
    ++i;
    }
  while( character != '\n' );

  buffer[ i - 1 ] = '\0';
}



init_keyboard()
{
  keyboard = open("/dev/kbd", O_RDWR, 0666);
  if (keyboard < 0) {
     perror("/dev/kbd");
  resetty();
     exit(1);
     }
  return( keyboard);
}

main(argc, argv)
 int argc;
 char **argv;
{
  int i;
 char c;
  char line[81];
 if (argc < 2 || argc > 3)
 {
  fprintf(stderr,"Usage:%s fichier vitesse\n",argv[0]);
  exit(1);
 }
 fildes=fopen(argv[1],"r");
 factor = 0;
 if (argc == 3)
    factor = atoi( argv[2]);
 scale -= factor;
/*
   if ( factor > 0)
      scale /= factor;
   else
      scale *= -factor;

   if ( (int) scale == 0) {
      fprintf(stderr, "can't go that fast\n");
      exit(0);
   }
*/
 initscr();
 crmode();
 nonl();
 noecho();

  init_keyboard();


  while ( 1) {
      read_line( line);
      for ( i = 0; i < strlen( line) ; i++) {
      unit_pause( 4);
      switch( line[i] )
            {
             case 'A' :
             case 'a' :  dit(); da();
                         break;
             case 'B' :
             case 'b' :  da(); dit(); dit(); dit();
                         break;
             case 'C' :
             case 'c' :  da(); dit(); da(); dit();
                         break;
             case 'D' :
             case 'd' :  da(); dit(); dit();
                         break;
             case 'E' :
             case 'e' :  dit();
                         break;
             case 'F' :
             case 'f' :  dit(); dit(); da(); dit();
                         break;
             case 'G' :
             case 'g' :  da(); da(); dit();
                         break;
             case 'H' :
             case 'h' :  dit(); dit(); dit(); dit();
                         break;
             case 'I' :
             case 'i' :  dit(); dit();
                         break;
             case 'J' :
             case 'j' :  dit(); da(); da(); da();
                         break;
             case 'K' :
             case 'k' :  da(); dit(); da();
                         break;
             case 'L' :
             case 'l' :  dit(); da(); dit(); dit();
                         break;
             case 'M' :
             case 'm' :  da(); da();
                         break;
             case 'N' :
             case 'n' :  da(); dit();
                         break;
             case 'O' :
             case 'o' :  da(); da(); da();
                         break;
             case 'P' :
             case 'p' :  dit(); da(); da(); dit();
                         break;
             case 'Q' :
             case 'q' :  da(); da(); dit(); da();
                         break;
             case 'R' :
             case 'r' :  dit(); da(); dit();
                         break;
             case 'S' :
             case 's' :  dit(); dit(); dit();
                         break;
             case 'T' :
             case 't' :  da();
                         break;
             case 'U' :
             case 'u' :  dit(); dit(); da();
                         break;
             case 'V' :
             case 'v' :  dit(); dit(); dit(); da();
                         break;
             case 'W' :
             case 'w' :  dit(); da(); da();
                         break;
             case 'X' :
             case 'x' :  da(); dit(); dit(); da();
                         break;
             case 'Y' :
             case 'y' :  da(); dit(); da(); da();
                         break;
             case 'Z' :
             case 'z' :  da(); da(); dit(); dit();
                         break;

             case '0' :  da(); da(); da(); da(); da();
                         break;

             case '1' :  dit(); da(); da(); da(); da();
                         break;

             case '2' :  dit(); dit(); da(); da(); da();
                         break;

             case '3' :  dit(); dit(); dit(); da(); da();
                         break;

             case '4' :  dit(); dit(); dit(); dit(); da();
                         break;

             case '5' :  dit(); dit(); dit(); dit(); dit();
                         break;

             case '6' :  da(); dit(); dit(); dit(); dit();
                         break;

             case '7' :  da(); da(); dit(); dit(); dit();
                         break;

             case '8' :  da(); da(); da(); dit(); dit();
                         break;

             case '9' :  da(); da(); da(); da(); dit();
                         break;

             case ',' :  da(); da(); dit(); dit(); da(); da();
                         break;

             case '.' :  dit(); da(); dit(); da(); dit(); da();
                         break;

             case '?' :  dit(); dit(); da(); da(); dit(); dit();
                         break;

             case '-' :  da(); dit(); dit(); dit(); dit(); da();
                         break;

             case '/' :  da(); dit(); dit(); da(); dit();
                         break;

             case '*' :  dit(); dit(); dit(); da(); dit(); da();
                         break;

             /*
              * add new characters here!
              */
             case ' ' :
             default  :
   unit_pause(5);
   putchar(' ');
   fflush(stdout);
                         break;
             }
  if (line[i] != ' ')
  {
   if (!(c = getch()))
   {
    putchar('\r');
    putchar('\n');
    resetty();
    exit(1);
   }
   if ( c != line[i])
    i--;
   else
   {
    putchar(c);
    fflush(stdout);
    unit_pause(2);
   }
  }
     }
 unit_pause(2);
 putchar('\r');
 putchar('\n');
 fflush(stdout);
  }
}

------------------------------

Date: 1 Mar 94 21:03:34 GMT
From: [e-mail]
Subject: Hamfest in NJ
To: [e-mail]

One of the first Hamfests this Spring season is the Splitrock ARA
and West Morris Wireless combined event in Denville NJ, Sat. March
5th at 8 am. Vendors at 6 am. Also VE session starts promptly at 9 am
(1 session only, register starting at 8). If ur in the NNJ/NY Metro
area, take rt 80 to exit 37 to Morris Catholic HS on Morris Ave.,
Denville. talk in on 2 mtrs 146.985 RPT.

KC2WE

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 28 Feb 1994 18:17:16 GMT
From: [e-mail]
Subject: MicroSmith
To: [e-mail]

Is there anywhere on the net or a BBS that specializes
in antenna codes. I am looking for the subject code to
optimize my antenna farmette. The xyl prefers that it does
not grow into a full blown farm.Thanks for any info.
Gerald Schmitt KC5EGG

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 27 Feb 94 00:46:22 GMT
From: netcomsv!netcomsv!skyld![e-mail]
Subject: MODS REQUEST: IC-2330
To: [e-mail]

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:

  [ snip ]
  >

  Yup, you're starting to go tit-for-tat and grasping at straws. Also, I
  note that your reply verbiage ratio has gone up. I'd say your agitated.

  Thank you for playing. For another flame, please insert 25 cents.


 Amateur: WA6FWI@WA6FWI.#SOCA.CA.USA.NA  |  "You have a flair for adding
Internet: [e-mail]       |   a fanciful dimension to any
 US Mail: PO Box 4425 Carson, CA 90749   |   story."
   Phone: [phone]               |            Peking Noodle Co.

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 25 Feb 94 16:34:17 +1000
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!sdd.hp.com!think.com!cass.ma02.bull.com!syd.bull.oz.au!brahman!tmx!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!asstdc.scgt.oz.au!asstdc!active![e-mail]
Subject: personal communication Australia <-> USA
To: [e-mail]

In <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Simon McClenahan) writes:
>Hi,
> I'm trying to find ways to communicate with my fiancee who
>lives in the USA. As I was wandering around the Internet trying to

Hmmm, perhaps I should put this in the FAQ :-)

Personally I think you'd be better off getting your fiancee to get an account
on one of the public-access Internet sites that abound in that part of the
world, and using e-mail.

If you're worried about people tapping into your more intimate thoughts, there's
always PGP. (Using amateur radio would guarantee a wide audience :-) and encryption
is not allowed for us amateurs)

Regards,

--
Mark Cheeseman  [e-mail]  Fido: 3:712/412.0 [[phone]]
PO Box 199 Alexandria NSW 2015  Ph [phone]  Fax [phone]

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 28 Feb 1994 15:30:21 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!library.ucla.edu!csulb.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com![e-mail]
Subject: personal communication Australia <-> USA
To: [e-mail]

Mark Cheeseman ([e-mail]) wrote:

: If you're worried about people tapping into your more intimate thoughts, there's
: always PGP. (Using amateur radio would guarantee a wide audience :-) and encryption
: is not allowed for us amateurs)

But PGP key exchange by radio is perfectly OK.

--
Grady Ward       | compiler of Moby lexicons:        | finger [e-mail]
[phone]  | Words, Hyphenator, Part-of-Speech |    for more information
(voice/24hr FAX) | Pronunciator, Thesaurus           | 15 E2 AD D3 D1 C6 F3 FC
[e-mail] | and Language; all royalty-free    | 58 AC F7 3D 4F 01 1E 2F

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 27 Feb 94 00:52:50 GMT
From: netcomsv!netcomsv!skyld![e-mail]
Subject: Software for DOS-PC for decoding Mor
To: [e-mail]

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:

  >
  > HamComm is a good program that will do RTTY as well as Morse. If you
  > can't find it from a local source you can ftp it from ftp.std.com .
  > Here is a desciption from the doc file.
  >
  >                                 HamComm
  >                               Version 2.0
  >                            October 10th 1991
  >                             W. F. Schroeder
  >                                  DL5YEC
  >

  Not the least of which is that it comes with a nice black and white .gif of
  the author.


 Amateur: WA6FWI@WA6FWI.#SOCA.CA.USA.NA  |  "You have a flair for adding
Internet: [e-mail]       |   a fanciful dimension to any
 US Mail: PO Box 4425 Carson, CA 90749   |   story."
   Phone: [phone]               |            Peking Noodle Co.

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 28 Feb 1994 15:40:40 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!swrinde!gatech!wa4mei.ping.com!ke4zv![e-mail]
To: [e-mail]

References <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
Reply-To : [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject : Re: Medium range point-to-point digital links

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Zack Lau (KH6CP)) writes:
>Gary Coffman ([e-mail]) wrote:
>: Ha, Ha. The problem doesn't come with mounting the gunnplexer, or
>: even aiming them, the problem is making sure they're on frequency
>: and making rated power, and that the detector diodes haven't gone
>: south. Most hams don't have the appropriate test equipment, or the
>: skills to fabricate cheap alterative test equipment. Yeah, yeah,
>: a radar detector can serve as a minimal activity checker, but that's
>: not good enough to set up and maintain a legal and efficient link.
>
>You could be right about that, Gary.  Maybe you can no longer
>expect people to fabricate blocks of wood to act as attenuators
>to see which gunnplexers work the best.  I have to admit I cheat
>on this--if I stick a gunnplexer inside our screen room and close
>the door, the attenuation to one of the lab benches is just right
>for weak signal testing. Incidentally, if you are serious about
>getting on 10 GHz, the March 10 GHz contest results in QST list
>a number of stations on the band.

Hickory or pine? :-)

I was thinking of more than some crude relative indications, though
that's often useful. But how many amateurs have frequency counters
or spectrum analyzers that cover 10 GHz, or even bolometer power meters?
I do, but I don't know many others who do. How many are setup to measure
sidelobe responses for optimum feed positioning? Even I'm not set up to
do that properly and have to depend on manufacturer antenna range data.
How about simple deviation measurements on megabaud+ signals at 10 GHz?
If we're going to build a reliable national network, we can't be cavalier
about what frequencies we're using, or the power and performance of our
systems.

Note, I'm not interested *at all* in DXing or contesting. I consider both
to be the antithesis to the cooperative model needed for effective networking.
While I respect the technical prowess some contesters have shown, I don't
think they have the proper mindset for designing reliable data links. By
their nature, DXing and contesting are based on freak conditions, that
once in a decade band opening, that unusual ducting condition, etc. They
are not concerned about 7x24 fade margins, or 99% link reliability. Their
goal is to *compete* with their compatriots for score rather than to
cooperate day in and day out to maintain stable links. I'd be happier
working with repeater owners whose concern for proper reliable coverage
zones and 7x24 reliable service to the user community are primary.

>: >One of the tricks to making microwave gear resistant to
>: >interference is to use horn antennas or waveguide in your
>: >input circuit.  They make a very low loss high pass filter.
>: >The waveguide below cutoff effect is quite effective in
>: >reducing low frequency interference.
>
>: Sure, that helps, especially if you use *enough* waveguide. You
>: need at least a 1/4 wave depth at the frequency of the *interference*
>
>Where did you get this idea?  I tried coupling two 10 GHz antennas,
>a scalar dish feed with 9 dB of gain, and a 17 dBi horn, and didn't
>see it on the spectrum analyzer (at least 70 dB of isolation below
>110 MHz).  I'd love to see a 1 x 1 x 2 inch 2 meter antenna that had
>no meaningful attenuation (size of the feed without the scalar rings).

Ok, if you're co-located with a Class B or C FM station, you're going
to have to deal with +50 dbW ERP signals, that's +80 dbm. Even if you get
70 db isolation, the signal at the diode is still +10 dbm. You've got
to do a lot better than that. A waveguide beyond cutoff is most effective
as a filter if it's length is 1/4-wave or greater at the frequency of
the interfereing source. (Attenuation doesn't get much better once you
pass the 1/4-wave depth.)

>The exposed terminal problems is easily fixed--you shield it, just like
>any other piece of electronic equipment you want to work next to an
>antenna radiating more than a kW.  Unfortunately, even the IF circuitry
>of microwave gear has to be shielded, but this goes with the territory.
>But, shielding is trivial compared to trying to filter out a signal of
>nearly the same frequency.  Thus, I don't expect people to have much
>luck using 219 MHz for receive on the same tower as a channel 13
>broadcast station.  As I said before, it doesn't make sense to try
>and do everything on one band--especially since we do have a selection
>to choose from.

Yeah, though actually the tough problem is going to be with TV channel 11.
That's the low side image frequency of 219 MHz. That's solvable with high
side injection or an IF above 10.7 MHz. Note I've never said that we should
do it all on one band. Here in GA we're using a mixture of 222 MHz band and
430 MHz band systems in a checkerboard arrangement. I've got a bunch of
ex-GA Power data repeaters for the 902 MHz band as well. We should use what
works in a particular situation. My only point here has been that LOS 10 GHz
is unlikely to work in a *lot* of situations for various reasons that I've
already detailed in previous postings. Where it *does* work, then it could
be used if the microwave expertise is available to install and maintain
it. Otherwise we're going to have to look to other bands for solutions.

Look, we're finding that maintaining a 56 kb link is beyond the capabilities
of a major number of digital enthusiasts. And that's pretty simple stuff
that can be setup with just an ordinary station monitor and a scope. A
national network isn't going to be maintained by people with more general
knowledge or tools than that of the folks who maintain current digis and
voice repeaters. Most of them are totally lost when it comes to medium or
wideband data. It's *not* that hard, but we've got a major educational job
ahead of us to get these people up to speed on these techniques. And we've
got to offer packaged solutions that require a minimum of external test
equipment to get up, and to maintain.

The ideal piece of equipment will have indicators built in to indicate
that it's operating correctly with a clean on-frequency signal, with
proper modulation, and with undegraded receive sensitivity and selectivity.
Having a built in CNR meter and discriminator center meter are probably
mandatory, but that's not enough. You also need at minimum a reference
marker source of known frequency and strength to check transceiver frequency,
stability, and sensitivity. When you have two widely separated link ends,
you must be able to determine if the end you're at is operating correctly
or not, or if the problem is at the other end. You can't count on having
service personnel at both ends of a link simultaneously.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | uunet!rsiatl!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     |

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 28 Feb 1994 15:28:30 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!agate!library.ucla.edu!csulb.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com![e-mail]
To: [e-mail]

References <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <rohvm1.mah48d-280294075939@136.141.220.39>
Subject : Re: Probable demise of the online repeater directory project

You may want to consult a Copyright Attorney.

Lists of facts, in general, are not copyrightable.

A particular method of organizing them or of selecting them
may be copyrightable, but can be easily overcome by
re-sorting or reformatting.

--
Grady Ward       | compiler of Moby lexicons:        | finger [e-mail]
[phone]  | Words, Hyphenator, Part-of-Speech |    for more information
(voice/24hr FAX) | Pronunciator, Thesaurus           | 15 E2 AD D3 D1 C6 F3 FC
[e-mail] | and Language; all royalty-free    | 58 AC F7 3D 4F 01 1E 2F

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 28 Feb 1994 16:39:20 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!pitstop.mcd.mot.com!mcdphx!schbbs!waters.corp.mot.com.corp.mot.com![e-mail]
To: [e-mail]

References <D>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>p.mot.co
Subject : Re: Dayton parking

In article <[e-mail]>,
[e-mail] (Jay Maynard) wrote:


> (Then again, who am I to complain? My DXCC count is nowhere near my weight...)

Gee, you mader my day!  My DXCC count exceeds my weight by almost
20lb/countries :-)

Wonder if there is an award for that :-)

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 28 Feb 1994 16:53:18 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!pitstop.mcd.mot.com!mcdphx!schbbs!waters.corp.mot.com.corp.mot.com![e-mail]
To: [e-mail]

References <[e-mail]>, <rcrw90-240294091440@129.188.192.6>, <[e-mail]>.mot
Subject : Re: RAMSEY FX TRANSCEIVER

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
(Jeff Herman) wrote:

> In article <rcrw90-240294091440@129.188.192.6> [e-mail] (Mike Waters) writes:
> >In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
> >(Jeffrey D. Angus) wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>    In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:  >
> >>      > That's old news.  BUT the HF maritime CW bands are still jumping with
> >>      > activity and the C.G. is still monitoring them, so CW on the high seas
> >>      > frequencies is still very much in use.

> >They are usually easy to spot, they are the loud CW signals that are
> >calling CQ for hours at a time between the ham bands.  Usually next to a
> >SITOR or FAX signal.  Sounds like electronic keyers (or computers :-) to me
> >though - no one sends that regularly by hand for hours at a time.

> Foolish.

Weak attempt at a flame?

> The ships don't xmt on the shore station's frequencies - they
> work QSK - full breakin - using seperate frequencies.
[...]
> You're hearing the CQ tape.
[...]

You must tell me how to carry on a QSK conversation when you are running
your CQ tape Jeff.  They must be *highly* skilled operators to do that - I
guess one of the lost arts of radio :-)

Strange that the SITOR and FAX stuff seems to be busy passing traffic all
the time even if you can only hear one side of it.

------------------------------

End of Info-Hams Digest V94 #222
******************************
******************************